• To: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• From: "Peter Jacobi" <pj@w...>
• Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 09:53:59 +0100
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E05573BFC@r...>
• Priority: normal

Dare,

It is arrogant and inpolite to say may "more info at" citing
a password protected page.

> As I mentioned previously, the seemingly contradictory dual nature of the
> ur-type is a known issue in the spec which has been addressed. 
> 
> More info at 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Jan/0065.html

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• References:
  • RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Do Names Matter?
• Next by Date: Re: MSXML DOM Special Chars Less Than 32
• Previous by thread: RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Next by thread: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread