[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: "Which Technologies Matter?" & xml processing model

• To: "'michael.h.kay@n...'" <michael.h.kay@n...>, 'Eric van der Vlist' <vdv@d...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: "Which Technologies Matter?" & xml processing model
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 11:29:12 -0600

Same for VB and C/C++.

Weird how that works for everyone developing 
a script-oriented framework.

God help the COBOL owners.  No one else will. 
... except all those hairy old making big bucks 
senior staff members.  :-)

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Kay [mailto:michael.h.kay@n...]


> >>Measuring the success of programming languages is very hard,
> >
If you count the number of lines of code that the programmer didn't have to
write, Java scores quite high.

• Prev by Date: RE: "Which Technologies Matter?" programming languages
• Next by Date: yet another distraction...
• Previous by thread: Re: "Which Technologies Matter?" & xml processing model
• Next by thread: Training
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread