• To: Michael Fitzgerald <mike@w...>
• Subject: Re: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 14:24:56 -0500
• Cc: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>, xml-dev@l...
• References: <AOEKKCOOGNDOAHCLNEIFCEKBCOAA.mike@w...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011120

Michael Fitzgerald wrote:

> I use [vi] almost
> every day (thanks to Bram Moolenaar, et al., VIM, and Cygwin). It cannot do
> all things well but it can do some things very well.


One of the things VIM can't do is support "ex" users very well.
At all.

John Cowan, "ex" troglodyte

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• References:
  • RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
    • From: "Michael Fitzgerald" <mike@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RE: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn'tdeserve its "X".)
• Next by Date: RE: Namespaces and URIs (was: A good case for Namespace URIs)
• Previous by thread: Re: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• Next by thread: Tool to Convert IDL(CORBA) to DTD.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread