Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Rather than getting RELAX NG into Xerces-J, I see a huge point in getting JARV[1] and the Sun MSV into JAXP. This would enable us to chose the technology without bloating the parser. A language neutral variant should probably be added to the DOM as well, instead of the mess (IMHO) that is specified in Document Object Model (DOM) Level 3 Abstract Schemas and Load and Save Specification [2]. [1] http://iso-relax.sourceforge.net/JARV/ [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-DOM-Level-3-ASLS-20020114/ /Fredrik Lindgren Matthew Gertner wrote: [snip] > > In terms of the future of RELAX NG, I also agree that there are a number of > plausible scenarios. At worst, some of its good ideas will end up folded > into some future version of XSD. For what it's worth, I don't see much of > the agenda of Redmond/Redwood Shores/Armonk in the actual spec. I believe > that if some momentum builds up behind RELAX NG, people will happily adopt > it. This will require creating some of the additional layers that XSD > provides (like inheritance, attribute/element defaulting, key/key ref, > appinfo, etc.) in some clean way. It was also require some basic marketing > efforts such as getting RELAX NG into the standard Xerces-J build, even if > the technical justification for this isn't entirely compelling. > > Here's hoping... > > Matt >
|
