• Subject: Re: MSXML DOM Special Chars Less Than 32
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 09:11:15 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <002301c1d275$9bd4b6a0$655169d5@pcukmka>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011221

Michael Kay wrote:

> (Of course there are solutions like using processing instructions or
> quoted-printable encoding. But I haven't heard any good argument why I
> shouldn't be able to use XML character references to represent these
> characters, which would seem a much more natural approach. 


Er, I offered one, which I believe the next sentence is an attempt
to refute

> In any case, the
> semantics of BEL are at least as well-defined as TAB.)


EOT.  ETX.  QED.  -Tim

• References:
  • RE: MSXML DOM Special Chars Less Than 32
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Do Names Matter?
• Next by Date: RE: MSXML DOM Special Chars Less Than 32
• Previous by thread: Re: MSXML DOM Special Chars Less Than 32
• Next by thread: RE: MSXML DOM Special Chars Less Than 32
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread