• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 13:21:27 -0800
• References: <D60D8F448216D611A21A00508B62B5BC5B25@e...>

OK. Now that I finally understand why this is invalid, what is the point
of allowing an xsd:restriction element with no children? Is it
specifically to allow me to restrict content down to emptiness and yet
still get the OO advantages (?) of using a restriction?

-- Ron

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• References:
  • RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
    • From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Next by Date: RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Previous by thread: RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Next by thread: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread