RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
1. We don't need a lot of implementations of XML Schema. 2. Where we need them, we need them to be compatible, otherwise, many will do as they have done before and pick one product, and it will be MSXML for a large number of users. 3. If the XML.COM article is right, and I think it is, Web services need XML Schema to work. They only need compatibility across implementations. This is a tool vendor survival issue. No one thrives on being incompatible. The users can push as hard as they want but the fastest fix will come if the Altovas of the world test their implementations in concert with the MSXMLs of the world and get it right fast. I should think this would become an immediate concern of the WSIO. len From: Adam Turoff [mailto:ziggy@p...] It's not just time and inclination that's a factor here. It's the fact that XML Schema is about as user-friendly as a stick in the eye. Let's concern ourselves with the domain of XML users. For the sake of argument, let's say that: 80% of these <snip>
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format