[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XML Pipeline (was: Stupid Question ...)

RE:  XML Pipeline (was: Stupid Question ...)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Lowery [mailto:jlowery@s...]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:13 PM
> To: 'Nicolas LEHUEN'; 'Thomas B. Passin'; 'xml-dev@l...'
> Subject: RE:  Stupid Question (was RE:  XML doesn't
> dese rve its "X".)
> I was wondering out loud today about the feasibility of using 
> Ant[1] to
> describe workflows. Why not? Building an application from 
> components is
> conceptually no different from building anything else from 
> components. It
> may not turn out to be the best approach, but it's certainly worth
> exploring.

Contrary to what many may think, I find it encouraging that I'm only a week
behind the curve:

"The syntax of the pipeline language owes a good deal to tools like make and



Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.