RE: XML Pipeline (was: Stupid Question ...)
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Lowery [mailto:jlowery@s...] > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:13 PM > To: 'Nicolas LEHUEN'; 'Thomas B. Passin'; 'xml-dev@l...' > Subject: RE: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't > dese rve its "X".) > > I was wondering out loud today about the feasibility of using > Ant to > describe workflows. Why not? Building an application from > components is > conceptually no different from building anything else from > components. It > may not turn out to be the best approach, but it's certainly worth > exploring. Contrary to what many may think, I find it encouraging that I'm only a week behind the curve: "The syntax of the pipeline language owes a good deal to tools like make and Ant." http://www.xmlhack.com/read.php?item=1564
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format