[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML doesn't deserve its "X".

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 17:39:32 +0100
• References: <B8AA8959.231E%KlausBackert@c...> <3C84CD42.7060805@d...> <p04330105b8aa8d46dcc5@[192.168.254.4]>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020214

Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:

>>I am changing a text leaf node into a mixed content including 2 text
>>nodes separated by a child element and this will likely break 90+% of
>>the existing applications.
> 
> Yes. However, XPath and XSLT based applications will process this 
> correctly without blinking because this hasn't changed the string 
> value of the ns1:foo element. The more I learn about XPath and XSLT 
> the more I'm amazed by them.
> 
Exactly. This goes together with other tips such as "define the 
structure of the output document in your stylesheets", "don't rely on 
the order of elements in the instance documents", ... which increase the 
capacity to deal with the unexpected.

It's unfortunately an exception amongst APIs, tools and languages to 
process XML documents.

This makes me think that it could make a useful extension for W3C XML 
Schema to define how to deal with the wilcard elements, something such as:

<xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="skip" 
foo:process="remove|value-of|copy-of"/>

Eric
-- 
See you in Seattle.
                                        http://knowledgetechnologies.net/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org      http://4xt.org           http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• References:
  • Re: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
    • From: Klaus Backert <KlausBackert@c...>
  • Re: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• Next by Date: RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• Previous by thread: Re: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• Next by thread: Re: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread