• To: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Subject: Re: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 14:44:50 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <51FETPOA53XZVRLFQO97RN91YOUS.3c84c972@MChamp>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020214

Mike Champion wrote:
>
>>>>It's probably time to look for the next wave!
> 
> It's out there somewhere ... the proverbial furry little
> creature out there dining on dinosaur eggs.  I don't have a clue what
> it is, but it's out there.  It will probably look as much like XML
> as C looks like Pascal or Ruby looks like Java, but highly refactored.
> And then it will get polluted/corrupted/ossified and the whole
> cycle starts over again ...

Please tell as soon as you see it :=) ...

And thanks for putting what I meant so clearly in perspective!

Eric
-- 
See you in Seattle.
                                        http://knowledgetechnologies.net/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org      http://4xt.org           http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• References:
  • Re: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• Next by Date: RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• Previous by thread: RE: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• Next by thread: Re: XML doesn't deserve its "X".
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread