• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• From: Fredrik Lindgren <fredrik.lindgren@c...>
• Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 23:12:46 +0100
• References: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E05573C05@r...> <3C9EEF2D.5040103@s...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1

Did they say that the W3C XML Schema specification was better for this, 
or was it just that the tool support for it is better when it comes to 
SOAP. Maybe we just need to implement some RELAX NG driven code 
generators and SOAP tools.

What do the experts on the list say? Is there anything in the specs that 
should make people choose W3C XML Schema over RELAX NG for SOAP?  Does 
the superiority of RELAX NG for documents mean that it is inferior for data?

/Fredrik Lindgren

Jiri Jirat wrote:

> I would like to join the discussion again.
> 
> 
> I have talked to developers and what I have heard was
> that their is at least one thing, where XML Schemas/ta are
> better than Relax NG - when you do deserialization/serialization
> of objects into SOAP messages.
> 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
    • From: Jiri Jirat <Jiri.Jirat@s...>

• References:
  • RE: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
    • From: Jiri Jirat <Jiri.Jirat@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Technical Book Slump
• Next by Date: Re: Technical Book Slump
• Previous by thread: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Next by thread: Re: Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread