• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: "Which Technologies Matter?" & xml processing model
• From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 16:55:28 +0100
• References: <200203191550.KAA01787@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020314

John Cowan wrote:
> Uche Ogbuji scripsit:
> 
> 
>>Measuring the success of programming languages is very hard,  
> 
> 
> Agreed.

If you count the raw number of statements, Javascript should probably be 
ranked high... most of the web pages including at least a couple of 
javascript statements!

Eric (half kidding and not wanting to start an argument...)
-- 
See you in Paris.
                      http://www.afnet.fr/afnet/net200x/programme.html#T9
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org      http://4xt.org           http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: "Which Technologies Matter?" & xml processing model
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• References:
  • Re: "Which Technologies Matter?" & xml processing model
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Next by Date: Re: "Which Technologies Matter?" & xml processing model s...
• Previous by thread: Re: "Which Technologies Matter?" & xml processing model
• Next by thread: RE: "Which Technologies Matter?" & xml processing model
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread