• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>,"'Jeff Lowery'" <jlowery@s...>
• Subject: Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• From: "Nicolas Lehuen" <nicolas.lehuen@u...>
• Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 22:04:36 +0100
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306DF62FA@HQ5>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
To: "'Jeff Lowery'" <jlowery@s...>
Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:32 PM
Subject: RE:  There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone


<snip/>

> Why is this debate still being held every year?
> 
> len

New year's resolutions ?

Regards,
Nicolas

• References:
  • RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Next by Date: RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Previous by thread: RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Next by thread: Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread