Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Dear Jonathan, ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@m...> > Even after reading your post I still agree with Simon. Lots of your > unsupported opinions (I suppose one does what one is good at). This is the second letter of this kind. But I'm patient. > I've read this message from beginning to end, but it just contains vague > whining without any substence. If you think "RDDL but not the current RDDL" > is useful for some purpose, what specifically do you mean. I don't want to > read rambling, rather a specific proposal. Certainly you must have something > in mind. Try to be constructive rather than destructive. Please. The constructive thing as I see it is : 1. Read my 'summary' letter (with the RDDL subject ) 2. Write me in private and provide me with the actual problem you're solving or planning to solve with the help of RDDL. By the 'actual problem' I mean some repetitive real-life task. Something real, like : "I run my homepage with RDDL". "I browse the Web with RDDL". E t.c. I'm sure that if I would try hard, I can explain you what tasks are 'real' and what are not. I just don't think we need to keep this process happening on this list. Rgds.Paul. PS. I think that when questioning my abilities to write a (trivial) bunch of code ( that's the 'constructive' content of two of your letters ) - you overreact. If that would be not on XML list (which is full of special cases) I would think that you're very junior, because such a reaction would be expected from junior developer. I hardly believe that people who have, say, 10+ years of hardcore coding (my resume is available on the web) can provide such a reaction, when somebody says that their project is a joke. 1. That means that if your coding experience is <3 years, I'd suggest you *not* write me at all. 2. If this letter is not constructive, then maybe I don't know what is 'constructive'. 3. If to be 'constructive' the letter should be good for RDDL ( and / or you ) - then I think we have a different understanding of the word 'constructive' and so you are also better not to write me. I think in any other case you can write me and then we may provide a summary for XML-dev. Up to you.
|
