• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Xml is _not_ self describing
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 11:48:55 -0500
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306DF627F@HQ5>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306DF627F@HQ5>

On Thursday 17 January 2002 10:55 am, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> The real arguments start at the API, eg, is the DOM a
> good real time rendering interface.  One argument
> has been, "Well, it works for SVG", but I am
> not yet convinced.   

As you shouldn't be (and as I'm soure you experience tells you not to 
be). I'm a big fan of "the right api/model for the job" too.

• References:
  • RE: Xml is _not_ self describing
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Xml is _not_ self describing
• Next by Date: Re: Recursive data structures
• Previous by thread: RE: Xml is _not_ self describing
• Next by thread: RE: Xml is _not_ self describing
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread