[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Jonathan Borden wrote: > FWIW, when I first saw the psuedo-XML syntax I had a negative reaction but > over time I've come to sort of like it. It looks like when a scripting > language is used to directly construct XML to be returned from a web server > etc. Which is precisely what I like about it. Given that the element constructor syntax was designed for creating element type names on the fly (a less than 20% case if I've ever seen one) I think it would be a mistake to get rid of this syntax. -- Ron
|

Cart



