|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: QNames in attribute values
Ronald Bourret wrote: > >... > > Every XML _parser_ must handle namespace scoping. Most applications > don't care. For applications, I think it's an issue in only three cases > (any others?): > > 1) Moving nodes around and the document uses more than one namespace > 2) Using QNames in attribute values/PCDATA. > 3) Serializing documents by hand. What does "by hand" mean? Serializers need to work with namespaces as much as parsers do. And that means that most filters do also. Anyhow, most of the applications I write or work with do one of those things. > I suspect this limits the problem to people writing tools. Arguably, most serious XML development is around "tools" in the sense of applications that are namespace-neutral (editors, XML databases, transformation engines, data binding engines, schema engines etc.). Part of the way the XML world works is that we XML-heads write these tools that hide the XML grunge from people who are trying to string together systems. Each of these "tools" stands in for a hundred or a thousand hand-coded namespace-specific modules. > ... (This is not > to minimize the problem. It doesn't look too bad in SAX, where > stack-based processing mimics the declarations, but it looks like a real > pain in the DOM.) It's a pain in SAX too, because if you want to write a filter or something you need to keep track of namespaces yourself. Paul Prescod
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||






