|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Auto-completion in editors (RE: ANN: XML Origin,
Dare Obasanjo wrote: > > Exactly what is inefficient about putting open tags in a stack as you see them > and popping them off as the tag is closed with soem flag that halts this > process when withing CDATA sections? Is there some sophisticated nuance I've > missed? When are you doing this pushing and popping? The user opens a hundred megabyte document and scrolls to the bottom. They insert the cursor and try to close a tag. There is no way to know the context without parsing from the top in real-time. Plus, you need to deal with documents that are not well-formed so you can't use a regular XML parser. I don't mean to say it is rocket science, just that it certainly isn't as easy as it seems at first. > I mean if Office XP can get away with all the parsing and stuff it does for > Smart Tags and spell/grammar checking, etc. I don't see why a much simpler > task like keeping track of open XML tags would be deemed as hard to implement > efficiently. The sorts of things that Word does are not really comparable. The spell and grammar checking can lag by several seconds. Plus the state is entirely local. I think your machine date is wrong. Paul Prescod
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Cast Your Vote
We need your help – Vote for DataDirect XML Products!
Winners and finalists announced at SOA World Conference in November. Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||







