• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 02:02:41 -0500
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306DF62F3@HQ5>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306DF62F3@HQ5>

On Thursday 24 January 2002 11:47 am, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> Steve's message is pertinent.  Maybe XML needs to, as
> a human does, be able to go in both directions.  That
> is, a parent constrains the element, but an element should
> be able to cite its eligible parents.

How is that contract to be obeyed?

> Packaging the application was what the MID project was
> about.  There turn out to be (in my experience) only a
> few solutions if one can bet past arguing over PIs
> and pointy vs curly brackets.

I'd agree with that. The MID was an interesting application... the 
system I did years ago was similar in some ways to it.

• References:
  • RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Compound processing
• Next by Date: Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Previous by thread: RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Next by thread: Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread