• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Is a namespace a set?
• From: Klaus Backert <KlausBackert@c...>
• Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 22:54:32 +0100
• In-reply-to: <3C4C7338.B5708B9F@s...>
• Sender: KlausBackert@c...
• User-agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.01 (1630)

Hi,

several contributors to this list said, that a namespace is a set.

In http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xml-names-19990114 the first definition
states:
[Definition:] An XML namespace is a collection of names ... XML namespaces
differ from the "namespaces" conventionally used in computing disciplines in
that the XML version has internal structure and is not, mathematically
speaking, a set ...

I would appreciate an explanation very much, because I want to learn more
about namespaces - and not only to follow the rather confusing RDDL-thread
;-) Is a namespace a set or not? Does it depend? Does it matter?

Klaus

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Is a namespace a set?
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Is a namespace a set?
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• References:
  • Is a namespace a set? yes, and rddl is not.
    • From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Generality of HTTP
• Next by Date: please unsubscribe
• Previous by thread: Is a namespace a set? yes, and rddl is not.
• Next by thread: Re: Is a namespace a set?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread