• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Xml is _not_ selfdescribing
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 13:20:05 -0500
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020115172829.02ce84d8@mailhost>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020115172829.02ce84d8@mailhost>

On Tuesday 15 January 2002 12:34 pm, John Aldridge wrote:
> Actually, CSV++ would also need some equivalent of XML namespaces,
> in order to allow (but not require) applications to draw their
> column names from a vocabulary with well understood meanings.

Got to be careful with that word "meanings" here though. I would say 
"from a standardised vocabulary".

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Xml is _not_ selfdescribing
    • From: John Aldridge <john.aldridge@i...>

• References:
  • RE: Xml is _not_ selfdescribing
    • From: John Aldridge <john.aldridge@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SV: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
• Next by Date: RE: SV: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
• Previous by thread: RE: Xml is _not_ selfdescribing
• Next by thread: Re: Xml is _not_ selfdescribing
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread