• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Xml is _not_ selfdescribing
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:53:47 -0600

From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jonathan.robie@s...]

>You think this has meaning? Romantics!
>Mere structure's the goal of our antics.
>Though this poem be pallid,
>It's well-formed and valid -
>We do not define the semantics!

Hi. How are you feeling?

Color patterns, limericks, all the same: a signal 
for which without the description, one can get 
the sense if not prove the formal aesthetic 
without inspection and training.

But it's good enough for rock n'roll.  To quote 
the most respected experts in that subject domain, 
"God gave rock n' roll to you, put it in the 
soul of everyone."  KISS 

:-)

len

• Prev by Date: Re: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
• Next by Date: [O/T] RE: Xml is _not_ selfdescribing
• Previous by thread: GUID and LUIDs
• Next by thread: RE: Xml is _not_ selfdescribing
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread