• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Subject: Re: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 21:54:42 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <00a701c19d62$cf6ede70$4bc8a8c0@A...> from Rick Jelliffeat "Jan 15, 2002 12:20:25 pm"

Rick Jelliffe scripsit:

> The first element name is not well-formed XML (unless Blubbery ends
> up allowing initial digits). 

<outrage>Blubbery?</outrage>

Anyhow, it won't.  That would break XPath pretty badly.

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@c...
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Miles Vorkosigan

• References:
  • Re: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: XML and Complex Systems (was Re: Re:AnArchitecture for Limericks)
• Next by Date: Re: XML=WAP? And DOA?
• Previous by thread: Re: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
• Next by thread: RE: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread