Re: Web Design Principles (was Re: Generality ofHTT
On Tuesday 29 January 2002 11:32 am, Al Snell wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Gavin Thomas Nicol wrote: > > The point really is that for data interchange, you can do things. > > Data formats can be standardized well (GIF et al. as you point > > out). For information interchange (i.e. data that has "meaning") > > it's much harder. > > I'm interested in how you define the difference; the meaning of an > image is a pattern of light, the meaning of a purchase order is a > request for a purchase. Yes, I wasn't very precise. I guess I should say that you can easily define data formats with a static, non-extensible set of components. A good data format standardizes the extension mechanism (as you note with PNG) to allow the format to evolve. The use and support of those extensions causes problems (as you also note). EDI IMPDEFS are a good case here, as are DTD's in general. DTD's/Schemas evolve over time. In theory, you can support an evolving set of keywords using combinations of underlying primitives (XEXPR does this with XML tags, and FORTH does it with words).
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format