• To: "'Bullard, Claude L (Len)'" <clbullar@i...>, 'Gavin Thomas Nicol' <gtn@r...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 14:44:08 -0800
• Cc: 'Nicolas LEHUEN' <nicolas.lehuen@u...>

I just read Pete's posting after writing up my own (cf. "A conceptual
excursion"). I sense a convergence of some sort occurring....

On xml-dev???!??!!!? Can't be.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@i...]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 9:52 AM
> To: 'Gavin Thomas Nicol'; xml-dev@l...
> Subject: RE:  There is a meaning, but it's not in the data
> alone
> 
> 
> A learning or training model...
> 
> len
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gavin Thomas Nicol [mailto:gtn@r...]
> 
> The "domain model" as you put it, is roughly equivalent to a 
> vocabulary with an associated set of semantics. So long as you agree 
> on the terms, you can communicate, and that is the whole point.
> 
> The terms *intrinsically* do *not* have any meaning. Only in the 
> context of the interpreter dot hey have meaning, and only if the 
> knowledge is shared and agreed upon will useful communication occur.
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
> 

• Prev by Date: Re: Compound processing
• Next by Date: Re: Compound processing
• Previous by thread: RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Next by thread: RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread