• To: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>
• Subject: Re: Compound processing
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 14:16:54 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <200201232130.QAA14165@m...>

Mark Baker wrote:
> 
>...
>>
> Nothing.  That's why I'm using a new media type.  Only XML following
> the dispatch rules I'm devising can use this it.  It's basically an
> easy out for people who don't want to define application/foo+bar+baz+xml
> types, but it obviously won't work for all integration jobs.

Under what circumstance would it be difficult to define a new
media-type?
 
 Paul Prescod

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Compound processing
    • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>

• References:
  • Re: Compound processing
    • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Strategies for a lowly XML document
• Next by Date: RE: Strategies for a lowly XML document
• Previous by thread: Re: Compound processing
• Next by thread: Re: Compound processing
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread