• To: Nicolas Lehuen <nicolas.lehuen@u...>
• Subject: Re: Re: Flexible Schemas (was RE: The task to be solved by RDDL)
• From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 23:19:10 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <NCBBKFMJCLIMOBIGKFMJIECDHBAA.ldodds@i...> <006401c1a0e8$867584b0$0100000a@nico> <p04330100b86f94943d5e@[192.168.254.4]> <047f01c1a14d$7bb640e0$0500a8c0@carnage> <p04330105b86fa1724374@[192.168.254.4]> <006101c1a1f9$81449a50$0100000a@nico> <3C4B3E38.1040007@d...> <00bc01c1a1fe$d6cb7e30$0100000a@nico>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020112

Nicolas Lehuen wrote:

> Why not use RDF instead ?


Because RDF is more intrusive than simple XLinks and can't be that 
easily embedded into XHTML documents.

When Jonathan Borden has announced RDDL a while ago, given his RDF 
background, I have been very surprised to see that he was not using RDF 
by XLink ;=) ...

And in any case, I am each day more convinced that the actual syntax is 
not what matters. RDDL is just a simple XSLT transformation away from 
its RDF counterpart!

Eric


> 
> Regards,
> Nicolas


-- 
Rendez-vous a Paris pour les Electronic Business Days 2002.
                                   http://www.edifrance.org/ebd/index.htm
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org      http://4xt.org           http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• References:
  • Flexible Schemas (was RE: The task to be solved by RDDL)
    • From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@i...>
  • Re: Flexible Schemas (was RE: The task to be solved by RDDL)
    • From: "Nicolas Lehuen" <nicolas.lehuen@u...>
  • Re: Flexible Schemas (was RE: The task to besolved by RDDL)
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Re: Flexible Schemas (was RE: The task to be solved by RDDL)
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <kpako@y...>
  • Re: Re: Flexible Schemas (was RE: The task tobe solved by RDDL)
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Re: Flexible Schemas (was RE: The task to be solved by RDDL)
    • From: "Nicolas Lehuen" <nicolas.lehuen@u...>
  • Re: Re: Flexible Schemas (was RE: The task to be solved by RDDL)
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: Re: Flexible Schemas (was RE: The task to be solved by RDDL)
    • From: "Nicolas Lehuen" <nicolas.lehuen@u...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Flexible Schemas (was RE: The task to be solved by RDDL)
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Flexible Schemas (was RE: The task tobe solved by RDDL)
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Flexible Schemas (was RE: The task to be solved by RDDL)
• Next by thread: 'document types' was ...Re: Re: Flexible Schemas
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread