• To: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Subject: Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There is ameaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 12:03:13 -0800
• Cc: The Deviants <xml-dev@l...>
• References: <NLV87ECHQ4Y1XRSQRPGCZXVPONDA.3c5832c7@MChamp>

Mike Champion wrote:
> 
>...
> 
> There was a long, long sml-dev thread on this horrid subject, and the
> conclusion (as I recall) that simply putting the full domain
> qualifier in the markup vocabulary was the cleanest solution for
> everyone concerned (except the typist).

This was a proposed solution at the time of the Namespace Wars.

 Paul Prescod

• References:
  • Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There is ameaning, but it's not in the data alone)
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: QNames in attribute values
• Next by Date: RE: Re: Auto-completion in editors
• Previous by thread: Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There is ameaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Next by thread: Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread