Re: URI intents? (was: RDDL: Negotiate out the Noise)
Jonathan Borden scripsit: > Maybe the only URIs that are not intended to be resolved are those that are > not associated with a network protocol. I thought the URI scheme "urn" was > for that, but people have created protocols to resolve "urn:"s so this isn't > necessarily true. No, indeed. The point of URNs (meaning URIs beginning "urn:") is not that they can't be resolved, but that they aren't bound to a specific use of some specific protocol. An urn:isbn: URI probably can't be resolved, unless the book is an electronic one; OTOH, an urn:newsml:reutershealth.com URN definitely can be, though we don't currently provide a publicly accessible URN resolver. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@c... Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact, at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door. --sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format