• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Nesting schemas?
• From: Andy Greener <andy@g...>
• Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 10:52:16 +0000
• In-reply-to: <3C54B6BC.6328.C9AE55C3@localhost>
• References: <3C54B6BC.6328.C9AE55C3@localhost>

Andrzej Taramina writes:

>Quick question....if I next schemas a few levels deep, do I need to 
>include the
>lowest levels at the highest parent level?
>
>For example:  I have a main schema A which includes subschema B.  B in turn
>includes subschema C.
>
>Do I need an include tag in A that includes C as well as B?
>
>The reason I ask is that XMLSpy 4.2 seems to think you do, but this does not
>make a lot of sense to me as I think they includes should cascade upwards. Or
>is XMLSpy just a POS when it comes to editing schemas (which opinion I am
>starting to lean towards).

This is a known problem in Spy - it has been reported and acknowledged.

Interestingly, the same problem exists in the Schema tool in the .NET Beta
(also acknowledged as a problem by MS).
-- 

Andy Greener                         Mob: +44 7836 331933
GID Ltd, Reading, UK                 Tel: +44 118 956 1248
andy@g...                       Fax: +44 118 958 9005

• References:
  • Nesting schemas?
    • From: "Andrzej Jan Taramina" <andrzej@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Next by Date: RE: What is the name of a document's "type"?
• Previous by thread: Nesting schemas?
• Next by thread: Re: Nesting schemas?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread