• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Negotiate Out The Noise: (Was RE: SV: SV: XML=WAP? An d DOA?)
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 21:58:59 -0500
• In-reply-to: <023e01c19ed1$acfd9d20$2cd0a340@paultx>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306DF6269@HQ5> <023e01c19ed1$acfd9d20$2cd0a340@paultx>

On Wednesday 16 January 2002 04:06 pm, Paul T wrote:
> In my oppinion, this architecture, if generalized
> and put on steroinds is the way to go and
> earlier or later it will happen anyway.

It  happened once, it can happen again ;-)

> > 4.  Send the code.  Java folks like that.  This
> > is the ultimate, Trust Me, I Own The Process
> > approach.  Augmented with a way to export the
> > information on request, it is easy for end users
> > despite any problems of performance, proprietary
> > languages, etc.
>
> Sure, some sertification of 'plugins' is implied. I'd
> prefer something other, than Verisign. Well, one
> can leverage PGP pretty fast ...

PGP and capabilities together make a pretty strong pair.

• References:
  • Negotiate Out The Noise: (Was RE: SV: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?)
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: Negotiate Out The Noise: (Was RE: SV: SV: XML=WAP? An d DOA?)
    • From: Paul T <pault12@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Negotiate Out The Noise: (Was RE: SV: SV: XML=WAP? An d DOA?)
• Next by Date: Re: Negotiate Out The Noise: (Was RE: SV: SV: XML=WAP? An d DOA?)
• Previous by thread: Re: Negotiate Out The Noise: (Was RE: SV: SV: XML=WAP? An d DOA?)
• Next by thread: Re: Negotiate Out The Noise: (Was RE: SV: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread