• To: xml-dev@l..., Jeff Greif <jgreif@a...>
• Subject: Re: [ANN] XML Limerick Competition
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 17:28:44 -0500
• In-reply-to: <00d301c19ae8$7ee74360$0402a8c0@DBDELL130G>

1/11/2002 4:39:49 PM, "Jeff Greif" 
<jgreif@a...> wrote:


>
> What a pity.  I had a limerick almost ready which 
> rhymes Cowan with how 'n'

Hey, I'm not one of those anal retentive types who 
would reject a huge purchase order becaues it's not 
schema valid! Any limericks that don't validate can 
go into the queue to be hand-checked for conformance 
with the spirit of "limerick" even if it doesn't 
match the formal type definition.  

I'm still thinking that a structural validator, for 
limericks (if possible!), purchase orders, or 
whatever would be far more useful as a debugging and 
auditing tool for the software that generates the 
XML than as a real-time tool for finding out 
interesting things about the instances.

• References:
  • Re: [ANN] XML Limerick Competition
    • From: "Jeff Greif" <jgreif@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: [ANN] XML Limerick Competition
• Next by Date: Re: [ANN] XML Limerick Competition
• Previous by thread: Re: [ANN] XML Limerick Competition
• Next by thread: Re: [ANN] XML Limerick Competition
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread