• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Effective XML
• From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@b...>
• Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:20:38 +0200
• Thread-index: AcGUYOoP9HVZRN8mSIu3KXXGW5JbVwAAA4pQ
• Thread-topic: Effective XML

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leigh Dodds [mailto:ldodds@i...] 

> I'd guess that the most common example at the moment of use 
> by reference is to include XHTML elements where one needs to 
> include markup text (e.g. product descriptions) within another 
> vocabulary.

I haven't really followed the thread but I think that's something that
many have been doing for some time; XHTML elements and their role are
familiar to both authors and browsers. Just a FYI to the list, another
plus just added to this approach is that XHTML Modularization is now
"schema aware" [1].

[1]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xhtml-m12n-schema-20011219/schema-framework
.html

Kindest regards,

Manos

<<winmail.dat>>

• Prev by Date: RE: Effective XML
• Next by Date: RE: Time to put SGML out to pasture?
• Previous by thread: RE: Effective XML
• Next by thread: RE: Effective XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread