• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 12:28:57 -0800

Let's not forget, also, that the implementation of the physical model
validates the assumptions of the conceptual model. 

But I think that's off-topic. I don't want to get Len revved up ;-)

• Prev by Date: RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Next by Date: RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Previous by thread: RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Next by thread: RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread