• To: 'Jonathan Robie' <jonathan.robie@s...>, Michael Rys <mrys@m...>, Justin Couch <justin@v...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: OT: Productivity (was RE: Re: [ANN] XML Limerick Competition)
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 08:17:20 -0600

Since Michael works for a generous company, the company could 
treat this inconvenience like others, and agree to provide free 
copies of XML Spy to those who agree to their conditions and quit 
submitting open source limericks.  

As for the hours of design work going into the Cowan-conforming 
architecture, it's good practice and will find reuse in multiple 
books on the topic of schema and DTD design.  Look how long 
the pizza stayed hot.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jonathan.robie@s...]

At 03:21 PM 1/11/2002 -0800, Michael Rys wrote:
>Seriously, could the limerick fans please stop or create a new list
>called xml-limerick?

Historically, diversion, hot air, and time wasting have been central goals 
of xml-dev. I don't think that the current threads on limericks distract 
from these goals.

• Prev by Date: Re: SV: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
• Next by Date: RE: Limericks, Stupidity, and Reality (was Re: [ANN] XML Limerick Competition)
• Previous by thread: RE: An Architecture for Limericks (was Limericks, Stupidity, and Reality)
• Next by thread: RE: XML and Complex Systems (was Re: Re: An Architecture for Limericks)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread