• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: ECMA Standardizes C#
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 12:04:55 -0500
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.2.20020111163359.02541cb0@p...>

1/11/2002 11:38:19 AM, Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...> wrote:


>Lets hope it is as successful as ECMA 262 at ridding the world of the scourge
>of vendor lock-in.

I detect a certain tone of irony here <grin> but don't really know much 
about ECMA 262.  Does it not provide a reasonable basis for interoperbility
(at the language level, not API level) across browsers?  Or is the fact
that I stay as far away as possible from the dark corners of the language 
showing here?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ECMA Standardizes C#
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
  • Re: ECMA Standardizes C#
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <kpako@y...>

• References:
  • Re: ECMA Standardizes C#
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: [ANN] XML Limerick Competition
• Next by Date: Re: [ANN] XML Limerick Competition
• Previous by thread: Re: ECMA Standardizes C#
• Next by thread: Re: ECMA Standardizes C#
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread