• To: "The Deviants" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There isa meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:05:49 -0500
• In-reply-to: <01ea01c1aa13$24a24780$7e64a8c0@i...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <E16W7JZ-0000Ds-00@m...> <1012451596.1809.1108.camel@l...> <01ea01c1aa13$24a24780$7e64a8c0@i...>

On Wednesday 30 January 2002 11:52 pm, XML Everywhere wrote:
> Adam Boswoth told me a story about "pattern" representation in the
> early XSL implementation at Microsoft.  

The idea was "match by example", where you'd 
give a sample XML fragment as the pattern to match. It was supposed to 
be like "query by example".... 

• Follow-Ups:
  • "Query by example" (was Re: misprocessing namespaces)
    • From: "Evan Lenz" <elenz@x...>
  • Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There isa meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>

• References:
  • Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
  • Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There isa meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There isa meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
    • From: "XML Everywhere" <host@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There isa meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Next by Date: Re: ANN: new markup language for user interfaces
• Previous by thread: Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There isa meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Next by thread: Re: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There isa meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread