• To: XML Everywhere <host@x...>
• Subject: Re: XML-RPC question
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 15:23:03 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <010d01c1a518$58d162c0$7e64a8c0@i...>

XML Everywhere wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Can anyone recommend known compatible implementations of XML-RPC for the
> following client/server scenario...

What a pedestrian concern? Using XML to solve problems? Don't you have
anything better to do?

XML-RPC is quite simple, the community is very cohesive and in my
experience interoperability is very good. So I would not worry much
about using it between C++ and Java. 

I have worked on a projct that used this C++ implementation:

http://xmlrpc-c.sourceforge.net/

It was quite good. Java, I don't know about. But XML-RPC is so simple
that trying out a couple is relatively inexpensive.

 Paul Prescod

• References:
  • XML-RPC question
    • From: "XML Everywhere" <host@x...>

• Prev by Date: RE: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Next by Date: Re: Entity resolution vs. URI resolution
• Previous by thread: XML-RPC question
• Next by thread: RE: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread