• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Better is better
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 17:57:02 -0500
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306DF62E8@HQ5>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306DF62E8@HQ5>

On Wednesday 23 January 2002 05:34 pm, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> http://www.webhistory.org/www.lists/www-talk.1994q3/0793.html

Ouch. I hate being reminded ;-) Still, this is a good quote:

http://www.webhistory.org/www.lists/www-talk.1994q3/1151.html

• References:
  • RE: Better is better
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Compound processing
• Next by Date: Re: Being "precise" vs being "human"
• Previous by thread: RE: Better is better
• Next by thread: Re: Better is better
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread