• To: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Strategies for a lowly XML document
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 11:43:06 -0800
• In-reply-to: <3C4EDE73.62D3CEA6@m...>

At 11:01 AM 23/01/02 -0500, Jonathan Borden wrote:
>Looking at 3 in particular, RDDL in its current form assists the task of
>3.1 and a RDDL PI would assist the task of 3.2. Would this be useful?
>
><?rddl-doctype href="http://example.org/some-rddl-description.html" ?>

Blecch.  Assuming you believe that this is a good idea, stick it
in a namespaced tribute required to be on the root element.  Then 
you can get at it through all the existing APIs and address it
with XPath and so on.

PIs are for application-specific processing IMHO.  This is not
application-specific at all. -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Strategies for a lowly XML document
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Strategies for a lowly XML document
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <kpako@y...>
  • Re: Strategies for a lowly XML document
    • From: "Jason Diamond" <jason@i...>
  • Re: Strategies for a lowly XML document
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>

• References:
  • Strategies for a lowly XML document
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Generality of HTTP
• Next by Date: Re: Strategies for a lowly XML document
• Previous by thread: Re: Strategies for a lowly XML document
• Next by thread: Re: Strategies for a lowly XML document
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread