[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Generality of HTTP

RE:  Generality of HTTP
At 04:09 AM 22/01/02 +0000, Miles Sabin wrote:
>But look what we're doing here: we're layering another protocol on top 
>of HTTP, a protocol which doesn't match HTTPs semantics very well. I'm 
>not saying it _can't_ be done with HTTP, just that there are better 
>ways of going about it.

Granted.  But to the list of HTTP's virtues we should add:

1. It's here and deployed and debugged and well-understood
2. It seems to degrade remarkably gracefully under pressure (I
   still don't understand why this is the case)

The take-away is that no sensible person would assert that
HTTP should be used for 99% of everything.  But a sensible
person has to raise the question: if HTTP can be made to work,
what's the cost/benefit ratio of using something else?


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.