• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: SV: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 21:51:40 -0500
• In-reply-to: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0201161523070.8141-100000@l...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0201161523070.8141-100000@l...>

On Wednesday 16 January 2002 10:24 am, Al Snell wrote:
> 2) Data corruption? XML parsers are *fragile*, CSV parsers can often
> cope with erronious data in ways that XML parsers mustn't if they
> are to be standards compliant!

...and then you have things that *insist* on validation... like 
certain web servers requiring a *valid* web.xml file. Sheesh.

• References:
  • Re: SV: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
    • From: Al Snell <alaric@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Xml is _not_ self describing
• Next by Date: Re: Negotiate Out The Noise: (Was RE: SV: SV: XML=WAP? An d DOA?)
• Previous by thread: RE: SV: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
• Next by thread: Re: SV: SV: XML=WAP? And DOA?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread