• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 14:22:00 -0800
• In-reply-to: <m38zaetokm.fsf@l...>
• References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020131083303.02814c60@p...><5.1.0.14.2.20020131083303.02814c60@p...>

At 06:31 PM 31/01/02 +0100, Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
>| If we had wanted to do namespaces on just elements, not attributes,
>| I'm pretty sure we would have ended up with AFs or equivalent.
>
>This I don't follow. How would you have gotten the processing
>semantics and resulting naming freedom by taking that approach?

Instead of <html:img xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/html4/" we
would have <img xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/html4/"  

Kind of nice I think. -Tim

• References:
  • RE: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
    • From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Next by Date: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Previous by thread: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Next by thread: RE: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread