[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


Nicolas LEHUEN wrote:


> Anyway, was does matters is that there is a great, great difference between
> a glorified editor with all the feature that you want (graphical editing,
> etc.) and an editor that may not have bell and whistles but which goes a
> step further by "understanding" the structure of your code, providing code
> completion.


I wonder what you think of Henry Thompson's XED, which enforces
well-structuredness at all times, but still presents a basically
text-editor view of the world.

I have often wished that it came with a "tidier" that would take
non-WF documents and force them to be WF to start with by completing
tags, even if incorrectly.

http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/~ht/xed.html


It's free.


-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member