Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Mike,
Michael Kay wrote:
>
> I think the assumption is wrong. You can validate any element against a type
> defined in a schema. This will typically process the descendants of the
> element, but it need not process the entire document.
This the case assuming that you maintain global data structures such as
the ID/IDRefs tables.
And assuming, of course, that your vocabulary can be described by a W3C
XML Schema which is another debate...
BTW, I think we should find a new term to express the fact that a
vocabulary can or cannot be expressed by a W3C XML Schema.
Eric
> Mike Kay
>
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>>The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
>>initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>>
>>The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>>
>>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
>>manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>>
--
Rendez-vous a Paris pour mes formations XML/XSLT.
http://dyomedea.com/formation/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
