• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Subject: Re: Schematron/Schema market share
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 21:50:44 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: "Xml-Dev@Lists. Xml. Org \\(E-mail\\)" <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <010101c1a186$77148e50$4bc8a8c0@A...> from Rick Jelliffeat "Jan 20, 2002 06:45:43 pm"

Rick Jelliffe scripsit:

> There have been some good first steps in
> evaluating Schema languages: the XML 2001 conference had
> an interesting talk from Eric van Vlist (available online, also
> paraphrased in an XML.COM article) and also had a very
> in depth Schema panel: I hope the panel judges will be publishing
> their comments soon.

So do we, brother, so do we.

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@c...
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Miles Vorkosigan

• References:
  • Re: Schematron/Schema market share
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Worst patents of all time?
• Next by Date: Re: RDDL (was RE: Negotiate Out The Noise)
• Previous by thread: Re: Schematron/Schema market share
• Next by thread: RDDL resources for validating XML documents
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread