• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, <xml-dev@l...>, "Kal Ahmed" <kal@t...>
• Subject: Re: RDDL possibilities
• From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@m...>
• Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 19:59:01 -0500
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020117142001.02b30e38@m...>

Kal Ahmed wrote:
>
> I would just be interested to hear if RDDL developers considered and
> discarded the possibility of creating a set of Published Subject
Indicators
> for a topic map-based solution (with the associated semantics) and if so,
> why ? One potential advantage in this approach is that later changes would
> not require additional syntax - just new PSIs and more semantics.
>

I am not sure what a "Published Subject Indicator" is, so at least I did not
consider that solution. What would that look like?

Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RDDL possibilities
    • From: Kal Ahmed <kal@t...>
  • Re: RDDL possibilities
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• References:
  • Re: RDDL possibilities
    • From: Kal Ahmed <kal@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RDDL (was RE: Negotiate Out The Noise)
• Next by Date: Re: Negotiate Out The Noise:
• Previous by thread: Re: RDDL possibilities
• Next by thread: Re: RDDL possibilities
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread