• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
• Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 21:11:37 +0000
• In-reply-to: <m37kpym99c.fsf@d...>
• References: <m38zaetokm.fsf@l...><5.1.0.14.2.20020131083303.02814c60@p...><m38zaetokm.fsf@l...>

[Steve Newcomb]
>   I've always felt that the beauty of an
>engineering solution has to do with things like
>modularity, minimality, and functionality.  If these
>are the operative esthetic values, then the AF paradigm
>is really quite beautiful, and its syntax is
>irreproachable.

An excellent troll Steve!

Sean

• References:
  • Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
    • From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
  • RE: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
    • From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Next by Date: Re: "Query by example" (was Re: misprocessing namespaces)
• Previous by thread: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Next by thread: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread