• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: QNames in attribute values
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:20:08 -0800
• References: <NEBBLOGPODFIFNJHLHBGOEBMEOAA.elenz@x...> <3C575C7E.5D63F19C@p...> <1012365334.1809.1064.camel@l...>

"Simon St.Laurent" wrote:
> 
>...
> 
> If you happen to grab the element with the declarations, yeah, it's
> easy.  Otherwise you get to deal with a lot of stack-tracking.

I'm just quoting, not agreeing! I've been through the argument so many
times that I can't even remember my original position yet. All I can say
is that I've experienced tremendous pain dealing with namespace scoping
and I don't remember any situation where I've benefited from it.

 Paul Prescod

• References:
  • RE: QNames in attribute values
    • From: "Evan Lenz" <elenz@x...>
  • Re: QNames in attribute values
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: QNames in attribute values
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: QNames in attribute values
• Next by Date: Re: QNames in attribute values
• Previous by thread: Re: QNames in attribute values
• Next by thread: Re: QNames in attribute values
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread