• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Re: AF and namespaces, once again
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 17:03:10 +1100
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306DF6303@HQ5> <m3adv2rt0f.fsf@d...> <007d01c1a6f2$c3410800$0301a8c0@n...>

 From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@m...>
 
> I think people are indeed using XSLT as a type of AF, just not calling it
> that -- so the concept is quite useful and does live. One might question
> whether XSLT is the simplest way to represent an AF, but nonetheless an AF
> is a transform.

Or, better, a view.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• References:
  • RE: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: There is a m eaning, but it's not in the data alone)
    • From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@c...>
  • Re: Re: AF and namespaces, once again
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Graph markup
• Next by Date: Web Design Principles (was Re: Generality of HTTP)
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: AF and namespaces, once again
• Next by thread: Re: RE: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: There is a m eaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread